Buried in these unacknowledged disagreements is a debate that never surfaces and it never surfaces because everyone assumes we already know what these terms mean. Yet in fact the meaning that different authors assume (and therefore-in the case of metaphorical usage-the import of the metaphor) varies greatly. Many authors rely heavily on the terms ‘space’/‘spatial’, and each assumes that their meaning is clear and uncontested. In part this concern about what the term ‘space’ is intended to mean arises simply from the multiplicity of definitions adopted. Here I want to examine just one aspect of these anxieties about some of the current uses of spatial terminology: the conceptualization (often implicit) of the term ‘space’ itself. And yet, in the midst of this gratification I have found myself uneasy about the way in which, by some, these terms are used. Suddenly the concerns, the concepts (or, at least, the terms) which have long been at the heart of our discussion are at the centre also of wider social and political debate. In some ways, all this can only be a delight to someone who has long worked as a ‘geographer’. And Laclau, in his own very different reflections on the ‘new revolution of our time’, uses the terms ‘temporal’ and ‘spatial’ as the major differentiators between ways of conceptualizing systems of social relations. Jameson, faced with what he sees as the global confusions of postmodern times, ‘the disorientation of saturated space’, calls for an exercise in ‘cognitive mapping’. Homi Bhabha, in discussions of cultural identity, argues for a notion of a ‘third space’. In debates around identity the terminology of space, location, positionality and place figures prominently. His 1967 Berlin lectures contain the unequivocal: ‘The anxiety of our era has to do fundamentally with space, no doubt a great deal more than with time.’ In other contexts the importance of the spatial, and of associated concepts, is more metaphorical. Even Foucault is now increasingly cited for his occasional reflections on the importance of the spatial. On the one hand, from a wide variety of sources come proclamations of the significance of the spatial in these times: ‘It is space not time that hides consequences from us’ (Berger) ‘The difference that space makes’ (Sayer) ‘That new spatiality implicit in the postmodern’ (Jameson) ‘It is space rather than time which is the distinctively significant dimension of contemporary capitalism’ (Urry) and ‘All the social sciences must make room for an increasingly geographical conception of mankind’ (Braudel). ‘Space’ is very much on the agenda these days.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |